Secrets of the Tomb: Skull and Bones, the Ivy League and the Hidden Paths of Power

Secrets of the Tomb: Skull and Bones, the Ivy League and the Hidden Paths of Power This Is The Only Expos Of One Of The World S Most Secretive And Feared Organizations Yale University S Nearly Year Old Secret Society, Skull And Bones Through Society Documents And Interviews With Dozens Of Members, Robbins Explains Why This Old Boy Product Of Another Time Still Thrives Today signedFraternity and get a free Popsocket with preorders before Dec 10th here

❴BOOKS❵ ✭ Secrets of the Tomb: Skull and Bones, the Ivy League and the Hidden Paths of Power Author Alexandra Robbins –
  • Paperback
  • 236 pages
  • Secrets of the Tomb: Skull and Bones, the Ivy League and the Hidden Paths of Power
  • Alexandra Robbins
  • English
  • 12 December 2019
  • 9780316735612

10 thoughts on “Secrets of the Tomb: Skull and Bones, the Ivy League and the Hidden Paths of Power

  1. says:

    Okay so things I learned from this book 1 Yale is kinda the worst 2 I mean it s probably fine.3 But if you have no experience of it and only read this book, it seems like basically the worst Elitist, conservative, snobbish, bratty, academically disinclined Alexandra Robbins doesn t do well by her alma mater.4 Skull Bones is the worst of these worsts.5 The patriarchs had hissy fits in the 70s when the current members wanted to include women wtf Also Yale only became coed in the 60s wtf6 People really cared about the Skull Bones while George W was president.7 George W was also the worst.8 Secret societies are ridiculous and really adolescent.9 Networking is everything and I m going to be poor forever.In seriousness Overall, this was okay I read it cause I m currently into Yale for writing research , not secret societies, so I found some of the chapters particularly the one outlining the Bush connections in excessive detail seriously boring BUT in the end, Robbins does a solid job of debunking some of the insane conspiracies, and I did really enjoy the history of Yale stuff.But honestly if anyone seriously thinks secret societies are anything other than pretentious little shits being pretentious little shits, I mean, they shouldn t.

  2. says:

    This was a disappointing read I was a big fan of Overachievers, and while Pledged was not as interesting, it was still a decent read The latest book from Robbins, however, was a huge let down It was almost painful to read, carrying on for pages and pages about Yale history, reciting old poems, and other stories only peripherally relating to the Skull and Bones society It seemed like she didn t have enough relevant info for a book, so she added a ton of unnecessary filler to stretch it out.

  3. says:

    When it comes to secret societies, Yale s Skull and Bones is the modern day equivalent of the Illuminati The author s theory with some evidence is that it is a bonafide branch of the Illuminati Regardless, it s hard to believe that a society initiating just 15 members a year with less than 800 living members at any one time could have a roster featuring most of the prominent members of the Bush and Taft families plus John Kerry.It s a natural source of intrigue has been for centuries and Alexandra Robbins wraps it together quite nicely Though not a patriarch, she reveals secrets and dispels rumors, having interviewed a bevy of Skull and Bones members She covers all the bases, way deeper than any Wikipedia page or Youtube video The tale of the Bonesmen is intertwined with the history of Yale, and, with that, the evolution of higher education in the United States While not as deep as the fraternal history book The Company He Keeps, it s a fascinating sideshow.There are arguments for and against secret societies through the book Surprisingly, at the end, the author reveals that she too was in a secret society Scroll and Key, no less The point that stood out to me is that several Yalies opined that secret societies, by nature of their exclusivity, served to goad undergraduates to achieve at the highest level possible The logic is that most people will hate the societies if that s what the crowd is doing, but, secretly, most would die for a tap a bid for membership Without a chance at this final stamp of excellence, many college students would lose ambition toward the end of their journey This is applicable, to some level, to mainstream fraternities as well, but, of course, we can t talk about it out loud.What makes this book a bit of a loser is that it feels like an attack on the Bush family It was published right before the 2004 presidential election People seem to forget that George W Bush was not as highly regarded back then as he is today the result of a meticulous, subconscious PR campaign Most people probably also don t know that Alexandria Robbins was the person who broke the story of George Bush s SAT score To this day, those numbers serve as one of the greatest rebuffs of Bush s I did it on my own legacy In a wild twist, this turned out poorly for the author, because the Bush family is considered off limits now Who would have thought Enjoyable story about American history and some of the country s most prominent families, but the overtones are too much.

  4. says:

    Read this book in a day, skimming some parts Definitely find it interesting how a club that takes only 15 members a year has produced 3 US Presidents Taft, Bush 1 2 plus John Kerry , Secretaries of State and Defense, members of the CIA, heads of every major bank, and a laundry list of employees in both Bush White Houses Definitely confirms what an old boys club old money club our country and our political system really is in many respects In short doesn t sound like there s much mystery or anything that cool about the club itself as a senior at Yale, but the web of network you re brought into for the rest of your life is stunning and creepy.

  5. says:

    This book read like a term paper, and was just as interesting.

  6. says:

    DNF at 33%It was slow going and a lot of dry to me history on Yale and the university system in the US I jut couldn t bring myself to pick it up for 2 days so I m not going to force myself.

  7. says:

    There is a lot of interesting stuff in this but you have to ask yourself how much the information in it can be trusted because for one the author gets a good portion of it from anonymous Skull Bones members who talked because they claimed they were tired of hearing so much weird speculation about them So for one, how can you be sure what they told her was accurate and not intentional disinformation For another even if what they gave her was true, its still information that they chose to let out but not the whole story Another big factor that has to make you wonder is it turns out that the woman who wrote Secrets of the Tomb was her self a member of another elitist secret society at Yale, Scroll Key This book is worth reading if your researching S B but you just have to wonder how honest it is The best book on the Skull Bones is Fleshing Out Skull Bones which was edited by Kris Millegan Antony Suttons work on the 322 cabal is also highly recomended.

  8. says:

    Eh, just ok It gets long in the tooth in many places when discussing the history of Yale, much of it not related to the society I decided to read the book because of the publicity about the society during the Kerry Bush campaign With all the discussion about what may or may not happen to members who talk, I find it curious if not unbelievable that the author would have access to members who so openly spill the beans even if she was a member of another secret society Why on earth would members of one secret society spill their secrets to a member of another, separate secret society Doesn t add up Nevertheless, it was an entertaining book Makes you go, hmmmm.

  9. says:

    Robbins Secrets of the Tomb has a wonderful thesis but the reader won t be quite sure what that is exactly until the book s last three pages Therefore, the work is extremely unorganized and confusing Had Robbins reorganized her work and offered the reader better guidance, Robbins really could have written something very profound by capitalizing off of the power of imagery and running with it Instead, the book comes off as a hodgepodge of questionable statements and out of place personal experiences with a magnificent finish.

  10. says:

    This book was a disappointment, mostly because Skull and Bones turns out, in her exposition, to be nothing than an association of spoiled kids with silly rites and little social significance beyond serving as one means by which the rich and the powerful network to their own advantage However, if you hate members of the Bush and the Walker families, all of them, this book with add fuel to the fire.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *